Loading Session...

Impact of Task-Based Instruction on EFL Learners’ Speech Fluency: Are Input-Based Tasks Enough?

Session Information

This presentation reports on the results of a quantitative study examining how input-based versus combined input-output task-based instruction impact EFL learners’ speech fluency. The study employs an experimental pre-test/post-test design with the participation of 102 Vietnamese EFL students who were randomly assigned to three groups (Input group, Input-Output group, and Control group). The Input group received input-based task instruction only. The Input-Output group was given input-based instruction followed by oral production opportunities. Meanwhile, the Control group received instruction unrelated to the target tasks. All groups received the same amount of instruction time, took part in the pre-test and post-test. The participants’ speeches in the pre-test and post-test were recorded, transcribed, and analysed in terms of fluency measures including speech rate, mean length of runs, frequency of pauses and self-repairs. The results indicate that both treatment groups outperformed the Control group on these measures. However, the combination of both input-based and output-based tasks was more effective than the use of input-based tasks only in enhancing learners’ speech fluency.
Sep 17, 2022 02:40 PM - 03:25 PM(Asia/Ho_Chi_Minh)
Venue : Poster No.60 (Meeting Hall No.2)
20220917T1440 20220917T1525 Asia/Ho_Chi_Minh Impact of Task-Based Instruction on EFL Learners’ Speech Fluency: Are Input-Based Tasks Enough? This presentation reports on the results of a quantitative study examining how input-based versus combined input-output task-based instruction impact EFL learners’ speech fluency. The study employs an experimental pre-test/post-test design with the participation of 102 Vietnamese EFL students who were randomly assigned to three groups (Input group, Input-Output group, and Control group). The Input group received input-based task instruction only. The Input-Output group was given input-based instruction followed by oral production opportunities. Meanwhile, the Control group received instruction unrelated to the target tasks. All groups received the same amount of instruction time, took part in the pre-test and post-test. The participants’ speeches in the pre-test and post-test were recorded, transcribed, and analysed in terms of fluency measures including speech rate, mean length of runs, frequency of pauses and self-repairs. The results indicate that both treatment groups outperformed the Control group on these measures. However, the combination of both input-based and output-based tasks was more effective than the use of input-based tasks only in enhancing learners’ speech fluency. Poster No.60 (Meeting Hall No.2) VietTESOL International Convention 2022 convention@viettesol.org.vn
157 visits

Session Participants

User Online
Session speakers, moderators & attendees
No moderator for this session!
No attendee has checked-in to this session!
2 attendees saved this session

Session Chat

Live Chat
Chat with participants attending this session

Need Help?

Technical Issues?

If you're experiencing playback problems, try adjusting the quality or refreshing the page.

Questions for Speakers?

Use the Q&A tab to submit questions that may be addressed in follow-up sessions.